Bookmark this page on your mobile

QR Code image

What is this?

Daily Court Reporter - News Police search that uncovered marijuana-infused candy legal


Police search that uncovered marijuana-infused candy legal

Dan Trevas, Supreme Court of Ohio

A traffic stop of a vehicle led to discovery of sealed envelopes containing 150 individually wrapped marijuana-infused candies by a Cleveland State University police officer. The Ohio Supreme Court recently ruled the search was legal and the evidence can be used in connection with drug trafficking and other offenses.

In a majority opinion authored by Justice Terrence O’Donnell, the Supreme Court concluded that officer Jeffrey Madej, after discovering in Edwin Vega’s car small amounts of marijuana, three cellphones, aerosol cans of air freshener, rolling papers, and an open package of fruit-flavored “Sweetstone” candy, reasonably suspected the envelopes may contain contraband.

“After finding marijuana and other drug paraphernalia in Vega’s car, Madej had probable cause to open the envelopes because it was reasonable to believe that they could contain marijuana,” Justice O’Donnell wrote.

Justices Sharon L. Kennedy, Judith L. French, Patrick F. Fischer, and R. Patrick DeWine joined the opinion. First District Court of Appeals Judge Marilyn Zayas, sitting for Justice Mary DeGenaro, also joined the opinion. Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor concurred in judgment only.

Traffic Stop Leads to Search

In March 2015, Madej observed Vega turn left on a red light at an intersection near Cleveland State. He initiated a stop and, when approaching Vega’s car, smelled a marijuana odor. He asked Vega to exit the vehicle and searched it, uncovering marijuana buds, the cellphones, the aerosol cans, the rolling papers, and the Sweetstone candy in the console. He also saw a partially opened U.S. Postal Service box with two priority mail sealed envelopes.

Madej felt the packages and believed they contained individually packaged drugs. Vega told him the envelopes contained stickers, but the officer did not believe him. He asked to open them, but Vega did not consent.

Madej then contacted his supervisor and other officers for guidance about whether he had probable cause to open the envelopes. He also tried to secure a drug-sniffing dog, but was unable. He wrote Vega a ticket for making an illegal turn and possessing marijuana. He then opened one envelope and discovered 75 packages of the same marijuana-infused candy he had located in the car’s center console.

Vega was arrested for drug trafficking. The arrest occurred one hour and 12 minutes after the traffic stop. Later testing confirmed each priority envelope contained 75 packages of the marijuana-infused candy.

Vega Seeks to Bar Evidence

In September 2015, Vega was indicted and asked the court to suppress as evidence the candy found in the envelopes, arguing Madej had no probable cause to search the envelopes. He also argued his constitutional rights were violated because of the length of the stop.

In January 2016, the trial court agreed with Vega’s arguments, and suppressed the evidence. The Cuyahoga County prosecuting attorney appealed that decision to the Eighth District Court of Appeals. A divided appellate panel affirmed the trial court’s decision, with the dissenting judge finding Madej had probable cause to open the envelopes.

The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case.

Court Considers Right to Search

The Court examined whether the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures was violated by the way Madej conducted the search and the time it took to discover the packaged candies.

The prosecutor argued that based on the materials found in the car, the officer had probable cause to believe the envelopes contained marijuana and had the right to search them. Because he had a right to conduct the search, it justified the time it took for him to attempt to obtain a canine unit for assistance and to conduct the search, the prosecutor maintained.

Vega argued that Madej had cause to search the car, but not to search the envelopes because they did not smell like marijuana.

Today’s opinion noted that the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Ross permitted warrantless searches of automobile containers that could contain items for which officers have probable cause to search. The high court ruled that if there is probable cause to search a lawfully stopped vehicle, it justifies searching every part of the vehicle and its contents that may conceal objects.

The U.S. Supreme Court revisited the issue again in 1999 and ruled that where probable cause exists to search for contraband in a car, it is reasonable for officers to examine packages and containers without having to demonstrate probable cause for each container they want to search.

The opinion further noted that in 2000, in State v. Moore, the Court determined that the smell of marijuana is sufficient to give police probable cause to search a vehicle.

“In this case, Madej testified that he smelled a strong odor of marijuana, which could not be accounted for by the small amount of marijuana he found in the center console,” Justice O’Donnell observed.

Madej also found the three cell phones, odor-masking agents, and cases of rolling paper, all indications of drug trafficking, the Court noted. Based on the Ross decision, Madej had the right to open the envelopes, the opinion concluded.

Length of Search Examined

In addition to having the right to search the envelopes, the Court also concluded that Madej conducted the search within a reasonable amount of time.

In the 2007 State v. Batchili decision, the Ohio Supreme Court had ruled that a traffic stop may be prolonged if there is “reasonable suspicion under the totality of the circumstances” to justify the detention. Vega claimed that after he received the traffic citations, there was no reason to extend the stop for further investigation.

In the Court’s opinion, Justice O’Donnell recognized that Vega’s argument ignores that there was probable cause to detain him and open the envelopes because of the strong smell of marijuana and other evidence of trafficking. The Court stated the stop was legally extended because of the belief the car contained contraband.

The Court remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

2017-0618. State v. Vega, Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-4002.

The opinion can be found online at:

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion, but only for noteworthy cases. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of court opinions. The full text of this and other court opinions are available online.

About the Supreme Court of Ohio

The Supreme Court is established by Article IV, Section 1 of the Ohio Constitution. Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution sets the size of the Court and outlines its jurisdiction. Article IV, Section 5 of the Constitution grants rule making and other authority to the Court.

Supreme Court Jurisdiction

The Supreme Court is the court of last resort in Ohio. Most of its cases are appeals from the 12 district courts of appeals. The Court may grant leave to appeal felony cases from the courts of appeals and may direct a court of appeals to certify its record in any civil or misdemeanor case that the Court finds to be "of public or great general interest."

The Supreme Court also has appellate jurisdiction in cases involving questions arising under the Ohio or United States Constitutions, cases originating in the courts of appeals, and cases in which there have been conflicting opinions on the same question from two or more courts of appeals. The Supreme Court hears all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed. These cases currently include both appeals from courts of appeals affirming imposition of the death penalty by a trial court and, for capital crimes committed on or after Jan. 1, 1995, appeals taken directly from the trial courts. Finally, the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction extends to review of the actions of certain administrative agencies, including the Public Utilities Commission.

The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to issue extraordinary writs. These include writs of habeas corpus (inquiring into the cause of an allegedly unlawful imprisonment or deprivation of custody), writs of mandamus (ordering a public official to perform a required act), writs of procedendo (compelling a lower court to proceed to judgment in a case), writs of prohibition (ordering a lower court to stop abusing or usurping judicial functions), and writs of quo warranto (issued against a person or corporation for usurpation, misuse, or abuse of public office or corporate office or franchise).

Other Supreme Court Authority

The Constitution grants the Supreme Court exclusive authority to regulate admission to the practice of law, the discipline of attorneys admitted to practice, and all other matters relating to the practice of law. In connection with this grant of authority, the Supreme Court has promulgated the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio. These rules address, among other things, admission to practice, attorney discipline, attorney registration, continuing legal education, and unauthorized practice of law.

The Constitution also gives the Supreme Court authority to prescribe rules governing practice and procedure in all courts of the state and to exercise general superintendence over all state courts. Procedural rules promulgated by the Supreme Court become effective unless both houses of the General Assembly adopt a concurrent resolution of disapproval. Rules of superintendence over state courts set minimum standards for court administration. Unlike procedural rules, rules of superintendence do not have to be submitted to the General Assembly to become effective.

In connection with all of the rules for which it has responsibility, the Supreme Court generally solicits public comment before adopting new rules or amendments in final form. The Court first publishes its rules and amendments in proposed form. These proposals appear in both the Ohio State Bar Association Reports and the Ohio Official Advance Sheets and indicate the period open for comment and the staff member to whom comments should be directed. The Court reviews all comments submitted before it decides whether to adopt or amend a rule.

Pursuant to the Constitution, the Chief Justice or a Justice designated by the Chief Justice is responsible for ruling on the disqualification of appellate and common pleas court judges. The procedure for obtaining review of a claim of disqualification against an appellate or common pleas judge is commenced by the filing of an affidavit of disqualification with the Clerk of the Supreme Court. The Revised Code contains specific requirements governing the filing of affidavits of disqualification.

Makeup of the Court

Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution sets the size of the Court at seven -- a Chief Justice and six Justices, who are elected to six-year terms on a nonpartisan ballot. Two Justices are chosen at the general election in even-numbered years. In the year when the Chief Justice runs, voters pick three members of the Court.

A person must be an attorney with at least six years experience in the practice of law to be elected or appointed to the Supreme Court. Appointments are made by the Governor for vacancies that may occur between elections.

Date Published: October 18, 2018


Supreme Court of Ohio


StarKist Co. agrees to plead guilty for price fixing

StarKist Co. has agreed to plead guilty for its role in a conspiracy to fix prices of packaged seafood sold in the United States, the Department of Justice announced recently.

Lawyer suspended for plagiarizing, having sex with client

The Ohio Supreme Court recently suspended a Columbus lawyer for two years, with six months stayed, for misconduct that included lying to his client about her legal matters and having consensual sex with the client while the cases were pending.

Man sentenced to 5 years for buying gun for convicted felon who killed police officers

Gerald A. Lawson III, 31, of Warrensville Heights, Ohio, was sentenced in U.S. District Court to 60 months in prison for acting as a straw purchaser for Quentin L. Smith, a convicted felon who shot and killed two Westerville Police Officers on February 10, 2018.

8 home security hacks recommended by police

(BPT) Did you know that many police departments have a community affairs officer whose primary goal is to build a strong working relationship with the community? That means you have access to a trained safety expert who wants to give you ideas to keep your home and neighborhood safe.

Human trafficking survivor, treatment court graduates discuss dark details of addiction

People with different backgrounds from different parts of the state who are bound by their criminal struggles with substance addiction came together to share their battles and triumphs during the 14th annual Ohio Supreme Court Specialized Dockets Conference.

Ohio slips further in latest Tax Foundation report

The structure of Ohio's tax system ranked poorly in a recent report from the Tax Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank.

The U.S. Attorney's Office filed highest number of narcotics and violent crime indictments since at least 2005

Under the leadership of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Department of Justice charged the largest number of violent crime and firearm defendants in its history in Fiscal Year (FY) 2018.

How to grow your 529 plan as your child grows: baby - toddler

Along with our age-based investment options, Ohio’s 529 Plan, CollegeAdvantage, offers age-based savings strategies for parents who want to select their own 529 investment options. No matter how old your child is, Ohio’s 529 Plan has guidance on what to do at this current stage of their life. It’s never too early and never too late to save for their higher education. In this first article of a six-part series, Ohio’s 529 Plan shares recommendations on what steps to take to build a 529 college savings account from when your child is a baby or toddler.

Health care CEO pleads guilty to $150 million health care fraud scheme involving harmful injections and unnecessary prescription of millions of opioids

A health care CEO pleaded guilty recently to a superseding indictment as part of an investigation into a $300 million health care fraud scheme that involved the distribution of over 6.6 million dosage units of controlled substances and the administration of medically unnecessary injections that resulted in patient harm.

Ohio ranks 9th in the nation in aerospace manufacturing

With a long, significant history in the field is should be of no surprise that Ohio is ranked among the top 10 states for aerospace manufacturing attractiveness.

Ohio State spinoff company targeting China for its robotics technologies

An Ohio technology company that manufactures a gearing system for robotics and other applications continues to make waves in its target market: China.

A no-pain gain to fight hypertension: UT research finds way to mimic exercise’s blood pressure lowering effects

Couch potatoes rejoice — there might be a way to get the blood pressure lowering benefits of exercise in pill form.

Justice, Treasury, and State Departments Announce Coordinated Enforcement Efforts Against Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generacion

The United States of America, through its Departments of Justice, Treasury, and State announced today a series of measures to target and dismantle the Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG) – one of the largest, most dangerous drug cartels currently operating in Mexico. These measures include the unsealing of 15 indictments, the State Department’s approval of large rewards, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designations, and the establishment of a citizen tip-line.

Man indicted for robbing five banks in August and September

A Cleveland man was indicted for robbing five banks in August and September.

Convicted felon sentenced to 52 months in prison for illegal gun possession

Thurston Lewis Goodjohn, 34, of Springfield, was sentenced in U.S. District Court to 52 months in prison for illegally possessing a firearm.

New ABA tool offers lawyers, health practitioners guidelines to create improved advance directives

The research on advance care planning suggests that people talk to their lawyers and doctors about advance directives, however the two professions see the planning through a different lens. A new guide, “Advance Directives: Counseling Guide for Lawyers,” by the American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging, is designed to assist lawyers, doctors and those in the medical profession, in thoroughly assessing the needs of a person in the hope that the end-of-life health decisions are understood and effective.

UD comeback falls short at San Diego in 36-34 loss

In a battle that went right down to the final minute, the University of Dayton Flyers had a comeback fall just short, with San Diego edging UD 36-34.

Attorney General DeWine offers charitable giving tips after Hurricane Michael

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine recently offered giving tips to Ohioans who want to help those affected by Hurricane Michael.

Attorney suspended after federal fraud conviction

The Ohio Supreme Court recently indefinitely suspended a Steubenville attorney convicted of a federal felony for his role in fraudulently obtaining $140 million in federal contracts targeted to businesses owned by disabled veterans and the economically disadvantaged.

BWC reports 7 recent fraud-related convictions

Six Ohioans and a Florida resident owing the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (BWC) more than $450,000 in back premiums and restitution were convicted on fraud or fraud-related charges in September.