Bookmark this page on your mobile

QR Code image

What is this?

Daily Court Reporter - News City not liable for accident caused by shrubs blocking view of stop sign

 

City not liable for accident caused by shrubs blocking view of stop sign

Dan Trevas, Supreme Court of Ohio

A city is not liable for the failure to remove roadside foliage that obstructs a traveler’s view of a state-mandated traffic-control device unless the foliage is actually growing on it, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled recently.

The Supreme Court held that the city of Campbell is entitled to immunity from a personal injury lawsuit brought by a woman who ran a stop sign and hit another car. Judith Pelletier claimed she could not see the stop sign at the intersection because trees or large bushes were growing in the “devil strip,” which is the grassy area between the street and the sidewalk.

Writing for the Court majority, Justice Sharon L. Kennedy stated that Ohio political subdivisions are not immune from lawsuits involving traffic accidents “caused by their negligent failure to keep public roads in repair and other negligent failure to remove obstructions from public roads.” The majority concluded that the stop sign was in good repair, and because the foliage was not on the stop sign, the city had no obligation to remove it from the devil strip.

Justices Terrence O’Donnell, Judith L. French, Patrick F. Fischer, and R. Patrick DeWine joined the majority opinion.

Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor concurred in part and dissented in part. The chief justice wrote that Pelletier ought to have an opportunity to establish that the city is responsible for removing foliage that fully obstructed the stop sign. Fourth District Court of Appeals Judge William Harsha, sitting for Justice Mary DeGenaro, joined Chief Justice O’Connor’s opinion.

Injured Driver Sues Property Owner, City

In August 2013, Pelletier was driving on Sanderson Avenue in Campbell and was approaching the intersection with 12th Street. Traffic on Sanderson Avenue is controlled by a stop sign, while 12th Street has no stop sign and through traffic has the right of way. Pelletier said she did not see the stop sign because of the trees and shrubs in the devil strip. The foliage was about 34 feet before the stop sign. She drove through the intersection without slowing down, collided with another car traveling on 12th Street, and suffered injuries.

In 2014, Pelletier filed a lawsuit against the city. She also sued Danny Saulsberry, the owner of the property where the foliage was growing; the Bank of New York Mellon, which had initiated foreclosure proceedings on Saulsberry’s properties; and Safeguard Properties LLC, which the bank had hired to maintain the property. The bank and Safeguard filed cross claims against the city, seeking to hold it financially responsible for any successful legal claim Pelletier might have against the companies.

Pelletier later settled her claim against Safeguard, and the city moved for summary judgment against Pelletier’s and the bank’s claims. The city asserted that, under R.C. Chapter 2744, the city was immune from liability. The trial court denied the motion and the Seventh District Court of Appeals affirmed the decision, holding the city could be liable if a trial court determines that the city negligently failed to keep the public road in repair by allowing the foliage to block the sign or if the failure to remove the foliage constituted an “obstruction” that the city was obligated to remove.

The city appealed the Seventh District’s decision, and the Supreme Court agreed to consider the case.

Parties Debate Court Precedent, Change in Law

Campbell argued that the Ohio Supreme Court defined “in proper repair” in its 1984 Hecket v. Patrick decision, which stated a road that is not deteriorated or disassembled is in proper repair. The stop sign on Sanderson Avenue was in good condition, the city maintained. The city also noted that in 2003, the General Assembly amended R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) to clarify that a political subdivision is not liable for conditions that hinder or impede the use of a public road, or such as foliage that creates a potential visual hindrance, because those are not “obstructions” as defined by the law.

Pelletier argued that the city had a duty to maintain the “proper operation and functioning” of the traffic signals that fall within the definition of a “public road.” She maintained that because the shrubs and trees blocked her view of the stop sign, the sign was not functioning and cannot be considered “in repair.” She also contended that that the foliage completely blocked the stop sign and therefore was an “obstruction” that the city had a duty to remove.

Law Favors City’s Position, Court Finds

The Court majority determined that the language of the statutes at issue is “plain and unambiguous,” which requires the Court to apply the law as written and not attempt to interpret it.

The opinion explained that R.C. Chapter 2744 grants immunity to political subdivisions from liability in performing a governmental function, such as maintaining a road. However, there are five exceptions to immunity listed in R.C. 2744.02(B), which can expose a government body to liability. The negligent failure to keep public roads in repair or to remove obstructions from public roads is one exception.

The Court unanimously agreed with the city’s interpretation that the stop sign was in good condition and that Campbell was not liable to Pelletier under the theory that the road was not “in repair.” The Court split on whether the city negligently failed to remove obstructions from a public road.

The majority opinion stated that the duty to remove obstructions extends only to “an obstacle that blocks or clogs the roadway and not merely a thing or condition that hinders or impedes the use of the roadway or that may have the potential to do so,” citing the Court’s 2008 Howard v. Miami Twp. Fire Div. decision.

The Court stated that it had to determine how the duty to remove obstructions applies to a required traffic control device that is part of the public road by statute. The opinion noted that while the parties dispute the meaning of the term “obstructions,” the term had to be read in context with the whole provision of the law, which creates a duty to remove obstructions from public roads.

The majority noted that the statute does not define “from,” so the Court cited a definition from “Webster’s Third New International Dictionary” in which “from” means a “place of origin, source, or derivation of a material or immaterial thing.”

“The duty to ‘remove obstructions from public roads’ therefore indicates that the obstruction must originate in a specific location: the public road. And because the word ‘from’ denotes a specific place, it cannot refer to conditions that are only near or in the vicinity of public roads,” the majority stated.

The Court wrote that the law does not impose a duty on the city to remove foliage from the devil strip when it is 34 feet, 2 inches in front of the stop sign and not on the sign itself. Because foliage cannot be removed “from” a stop sign if it is not on the stop sign, the city is immune, the Court concluded.

The Court remanded the case to the trial court and directed it to grant the city’s request for summary judgment.

Dissent Raises Lawmakers’ Intent

In her partially concurring and dissenting opinion, Chief Justice O’Connor noted the General Assembly amended R.C. 2744(B)(3), which exposed political subdivisions to liability if they failed to keep a road “free from nuisance.” The language was changed to “negligent failure to remove obstructions from public roads,” and this appeal is the first time the Court has had to apply the new language to a case involving the obstruction of a stop sign, she observed.

The opinion maintained the majority focused almost exclusively on the word “from” and barely considered the word “obstruction,” even though it was one of the terms the legislature added to the statute. It asserted there is no question that an object can obstruct or block a traffic signal without being literally on it.

“The majority effectively rewrites the statute by interpreting the word ‘from’ to mean ‘on’ based on a single definition of the word ‘from’ that the majority selects out of multiple offerings in the dictionary,” the opinion stated.

The opinion stated the majority’s definition of “from” is incompatible with the testimony legislators heard prior to voting to amend the law, including the testimony of Rep. Jay Hottinger, sponsor of the bill making the changes. The opinion noted that Hottinger said the law at the time made a political subdivision liable for “any” failure to remove an obstruction, and the intent was to limit liability to only situations where the government was “negligent” in its failure to remove an obstruction.

The opinion concluded that there was no evidence the legislature intended to require that an obstacle be touching the public road in order for the political subdivision to be held liable, and that the city in this case may be held liable for negligently failing to remove an obstruction. The decision as to whether the city was negligent and if the tree was actually obstructing the sign is a question for the trial court, the opinion stated.

2017-0088. Pelletier v. Campbell, Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-2121.

The opinion can be read online at: http://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2018/SCO/0605/170088.asp#.WxfMuSAh2Uk

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion, but only for noteworthy cases. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of court opinions. The full text of this and other court opinions are available online.

Date Published: June 27, 2018

 

Supreme Court of Ohio

 

Hundreds arrested, dozens of firearms seized, 60 kilograms of cocaine and five kilograms of heroin seized as part of "Operation We Are CLE"

The U.S. Marshals Service and Drug Enforcement Administration, working with federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, recently completed the first phase of “Operation We Are CLE,” resulting in the arrests of more than 200 people, confiscation of 36 firearms and seizure of 60 kilograms of cocaine and nearly five kilograms of heroin in Cleveland.

Older adults are at higher risk for complications from extreme heat

The Ohio Department of Aging reminds all Ohioans to treat hot temperatures and high humidity levels as severe weather. As we age our bodies may become less able to adapt to extreme conditions. In addition, older adults are more likely to have chronic health conditions that can upset normal body responses to heat, like sweating. With more health issues can also come more prescription medicines, which can also impair our bodies’ ability to regulate temperature.

Access to birth control, education hallmarks of Prevention First bill

A bill intended to curb unplanned pregnancies and indirectly reduce the state's high infant mortality rate was the subject of a recent hearing before lawmakers in the Ohio House of Representatives.

Ohio ranked in the middle of the pack in new economic report

Ohio's economy placed near the middle when compared with the other 49 states and the nation's capital.

Bill would allow municipal tax to pay for dental care for at-risk children

A Cleveland Democrat pitched a legislative measure to allow Ohio municipalities to levy a tax for the purposes of covering costs of dental health of a city's most vulnerable residents.

Supreme Court of Ohio considers prosecutorial opposition to new trial for man sentenced to death for murder

The Ohio Supreme Court on Tuesday, June 26th, heard four oral arguments, including a challenge by the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office of the new trial ordered for Anthony Apanovitch who was sentenced to death for the 1984 murder and rape of a Cleveland woman.

Residents of Ohio’s nursing homes and assisted living facilities rate their providers

The Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, a division of the Ohio Department of Aging, has released results of the 2017 Long-Term Care Resident Satisfaction Survey. The survey, conducted through face-to-face interviews with residents of nursing homes and residential care (assisted living) facilities, gauges residents’ satisfaction with an array of focus areas related to their care and everyday life.

Lawmaker comes up with 'AWFUL' plan for legislator pay adjustments

A Cincinnati Republican recently proposed a method to adjust legislators' pay that would alleviate the need for lawmakers themselves to do the math.

Attorney General DeWine announces $100 million multistate settlement with Citibank over Libor manipulation

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine, along with 41 other attorneys general, recently announced a $100 million settlement with Citibank for fraudulent conduct involving the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, a key interest rate with widespread impact on global markets.

Supreme Court of Ohio considers disciplinary action against attorney who accused judges of incompetence

The Ohio Supreme Court on Tuesday, June 26th, heard four oral arguments, including an issue brought by the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct which is recommending a one-year suspension with six months stayed for Cleveland attorney Richard A. Oviatt. According to the board’s report, the attorney “impugned the integrity of the judges from the Eighth District Court of Appeals by accusing them of incompetence, corruption, and criminal conduct.”

Author of state health care transparency law offers revision

The southwest Ohio lawmaker who devised the Ohio Price Transparency Law in 2015 has proposed a new version of the law, making health insurance companies responsible for estimates of health care costs rather than physicians - as originally enacted.

Attorney General DeWine announces six arrests following seizure of $3.4 million in cocaine

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine and members of the Central Ohio Organized Crime Investigations Commission/High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Task Force announced recently the arrests of six people following the seizure of approximately 75 pounds of cocaine.

Ohio Department of Education celebrates new graduates headed to U.S. military

In a first-ever ceremony held at The Ohio State University, the Ohio Department of Education recently celebrated the members of the class of 2018 who are joining the U.S. military.

Men arrested in connection with 20-pound fentanyl seizure charged federally

Four men have been charged federally in a case involving the seizure of approximately 20 pounds of fentanyl.

Freedom Celebration 2018 –with featured guest, Sebastian Gorka

First Grace of Dayton, Ohio will host its 30th anniversary Freedom Celebration, Sunday July 8th. This year’s Freedom Celebration 2018 will feature a keynote address by Dr. Sebastian Gorka, former Deputy Assistant National Security Advisor to President Donald J Trump and NY Times best-selling author of Defeating Jihad; The Winnable War. Dr. Gorka has just returned from Singapore, where he was a witness to the historic, landmark U.S.-North Korea Summit and he will be sharing observations concerning this agreement and its implications for our own national security. Sebastian Gorka is uniquely qualified to speak to issues of national security and American freedom as he shares his own story of fleeing the oppression of communism as a child and legally immigrating to the U.S., where he rose to the pinnacle of power and influence as an advisor to the President in the White House! He will be introducing his brand new book, (which is set for release on September 25, 2018), Why We Fight: Recovering America’s Will to Win at the Freedom Celebration.

Three Raiders drafted in the annual MLB Draft

Three Raiders drafted in the annual MLB Draft: Matt Morrow signs with Pirates; Ryan Weiss signs with Diamondbacks; Caleb Sampen signs with Dodgers.

Wright State expects to post multimillion-dollar budget surpluses after years of deficits

Emerging from years of overspending and budget deficits, Wright State will post a $7.2 million budget surplus this year and has crafted a fiscal 2019 budget with a $3 million surplus that earmarks funds for strategic investments to bolster tuition revenue and build the university’s future.

The Ohio State Bar Foundation inducts new members into fellows program

OSBF welcomes 32 attorneys to its efforts to advance the law and build a better justice system

Man indicted for selling heroin that resulted in fatal overdose

A Toledo man was indicted in federal court for selling heroin that resulted in a fatal overdose last year, said U.S. Attorney Justin E. Herdman and FBI Special Agent in Charge Stephen D. Anthony.

Pro Bono hours reported increases in Ohio

The number of pro bono hours provided by attorneys to low-income Ohioans has gone up.