Bookmark this page on your mobile

QR Code image

What is this?

Daily Court Reporter - News Probate court must consider domestic court proceedings before granting adoption


Probate court must consider domestic court proceedings before granting adoption

Dan Trevas, Supreme Court of Ohio

A probate court’s authority to grant an adoption is blocked when an issue of paternity is pending in another court. But the court is not impeded if a “parenting matter,” such as a parenting time dispute, is pending, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled recently.

Even though it can proceed with an adoption, a probate court must consider the effect of the “parenting matter” when determining whether a parent’s consent for the adoption is required, the Supreme Court added when deciding the case of a contentious adoption in Clinton County.

The 5-2 decision clarifies a 2006 Supreme Court opinion, which stated that a “probate court may not proceed with an adoption petition if any pending parenting matter is proceeding in another court.” Writing for the majority, Justice Judith L. French stated that a father who opposes the Clinton County adoption cannot rely on his attempt to reestablish parenting time in Montgomery County to stop the adoption, but the probate court should consider the father’s efforts when determining whether the adoption may proceed without the father’s consent.

Justice French’s opinion was joined by Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor and Justices Sharon L. Kennedy and Patrick F. Fischer. Sixth District Court of Appeals Judge Mark L. Pietrykowski, sitting for former Justice William M. O’Neill, also joined the opinion.

Justice Terrence O’Donnell, in a dissenting opinion joined by Justice R. Patrick DeWine, wrote the state law does not require the probate court to consider the existence of pending matters in other courts, and that interpretation is a new burden on probate courts that was not imposed by the state legislature.

Stepfather Seeks to Adopt Children

Justice French wrote that the Supreme Court’s analysis of how to apply the law in this case was complicated by the antagonistic 13-year relationship between the parents after their divorce. The parents each alleged abuse of the children by the other and regularly failed to comply with court orders. The mother impeded the father’s parenting time from the outset of the 2004 divorce decree, the Court stated.

After going nearly six years without having contact with his children, the father learned the children, identified in court documents as M.G.B.-E. and R.S.B.-E, were attending Wilmington High School in 2014. The father attempted to contact his son, R.S.B.-E., at a school sporting event in 2015, but was stopped by the mother and her new husband, the children’s stepfather. The father and mother were divorced in Montgomery County Domestic Relations Court.

In May 2015, the father, having discovered where his children were living, filed a motion in the domestic-relations court to reestablish parenting time with the children. Four days later, the stepfather filed for adoption of the children in Clinton County Probate Court.

Ohio law requires a parent’s consent to an adoption, but the law — R.C. 3107.07(A) —contains an exception. A natural parent’s consent is not required if the parent failed “without justifiable cause to provide more than de minimis contact with the children for at least a year immediately preceding the filing of the adoption petitions.” The stepfather contended that the exception applied, and the probate court conducted a hearing on the matter.

The probate court indicated that it gave great consideration to the father’s failure to follow up on a 2007 order by the domestic relations court to arrange and pay for counseling in order to reinstate his visitation rights at the time. The father admitted he “dropped the ball” on the counseling but complained that the mother contributed to the failure by obstructing his ability to spend time with their children. The probate court’s decision that the father’s consent was not required for the adoption of his children did not mention anything about the father’s pending motion to reestablish parenting time.

While the adoption proceedings were pending, the Montgomery County domestic relations court granted the father limited parenting time, and kept the case open for future proceedings. The father appealed the probate court’s order denying that he needed to consent to the adoption. The Twelfth District Court of Appeals affirmed the probate court’s decision. The father appealed that ruling to the Supreme Court.

“Parenting Matter” Definition Examined

Justice French explained the father asked the Court to broadly rule that a probate court cannot proceed with an adoption if any pending parenting matter is proceeding in another court. The father relied on the Court’s 2006 In re Adoption of Pushcar decision where the Court referred to any “parenting matter.” In Pushcar, the child’s stepfather attempted to proceed with the adoption of his wife’s child, who was born out of wedlock. The natural father was seeking visitation rights in juvenile court, and those proceedings were delayed until the man could establish paternity. The probate court intended to move forward with the adoption, finding the father had not had more than minimal contact with the child in more than a year. The Eleventh District Court of Appeals blocked the probate court, finding the question of paternity needed to be decided in juvenile court before the probate court could determine if the father’s consent was required. The Supreme Court affirmed the Eleventh District’s decision.

In today’s decision, the Court noted that in recent cases citing Pushcar, the Court has stated that in 2006 it was referencing matters of “parentage” not “parenting.” “Parentage” is a narrower term than “parenting” and refers to issues such as paternity. “Parenting” more broadly considers issues such as custody, visitation, and parenting time, the Court concluded.

“We read Pushcar as requiring the probate court to refrain from acting until the juvenile court had determined the child’s paternity, because until that occurred, the probate court could not determine whether the father’s consent is required,” the Court stated.

The Clinton County Probate Court does not face that impediment, the opinion stated. It added that there is no finding that needs to be relayed by the domestic relations court for the probate court to determine if the father attempted to make contact with his children in the year prior to the adoption filing.

Parenting Proceedings Must Be Considered

The Court noted that while a pending parenting matter cannot stop the probate court from proceeding, the stepfather must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the father did not have more than minimal contact with the children. The opinion stated that even if a parent has completely failed to communicate with the children, the consent could still be required if there was justifiable cause for not having contact.

The Court noted that in other cases a parent has been considered to have justifiable cause for not communicating when the custodial parent significantly interferes or discourages communication. The Court ruled that the probate court must take into account the father’s efforts to reestablish parental rights through the domestic relations court and the mother’s attempts to block him from interacting with the children.

Consideration of Other Court’s Actions Not Required, Dissent Concludes

In his dissent, Justice O’Donnell noted that 3107.07(A) does not require probate courts to consider pending parenting matters.

“Although the legislature could have required probate courts to make such a determination, it chose not to do so; despite the lack of statutory authorization, the majority judicially adds this new factor for probate courts to consider in adoption cases,” he wrote.

The dissenting opinion stated this requirement increases the complexity of problems probate courts face in adoption cases and opens a new field of interpretation to the phrase “without justifiable cause.” The opinion concluded the requirement unnecessarily complicates an already difficult situation and will lead to consequences not intended by the General Assembly.

The dissent maintained that the probate court concluded that clear and convincing evidence was presented that the father failed without justifiable cause to make contact with the children. The dissent would affirm the probate court’s decision.

2017-0039. In re Adoption of M.G.B.-E., Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-1787.

The opinion can be read online at:

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion, but only for noteworthy cases. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of court opinions. The full text of this and other court opinions are available online.

Date Published: May 24, 2018


Supreme Court of Ohio


Supreme Court of Court affirms death sentence for teen’s murderer

The Ohio Supreme Court took into account the fact that a man who plotted to rob and kill a childhood friend had just turned 19 years old at the time of the murder, but that was not enough to reverse the death penalty he received from a Warren County court.

Lawmakers mull local self-defense statutes

House lawmakers recently considered further testimony both for and against a bill that would codify an affirmative claim of self defense for Ohioans who own and use guns.

State hires law firm to remove sealed records faster for background checks

The state of Ohio has hired a law firm to remove former offenders' sealed criminal records from background check company databases faster.

If it can rain, it can flood: Why flood insurance is a wise bet for homeowners

(BPT) The federal government considers floods the nation's most common natural disaster. They strike every state and leave homeowners with huge repair costs. Why? Because typical homeowners insurance doesn't cover flood damage.

Common Good: Mental health and criminal justice

More than 383,000 adults with serious mental illnesses are being held in a U.S. jail or prison, according to the nonprofit Treatment Advocacy Center. Of the 64,000 people jailed or imprisoned in Ohio in 2005, more than 10,000 were estimated to have serious mental illnesses.

SBA partners with veterans employment program

The U.S. Small Business Administration announced this week a partnership with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to give service members access to self-employment assistance to kickstart any untapped entrepreneurial spirit in the ranks of American heroes.

State lawmakers move to make 'spoofing' phone numbers illegal

Lawmakers keen on quashing the practice of manipulating parts of or entire phone numbers to obfuscate the caller's identity for purposes of defrauding the call recipient are expected to consider a bill that would make the trick a criminal offense.

Bond issue proposed to attack toxic algae blooms

A pair of state lawmakers whose districts abut Lake Erie recently proposed a solution to the dangerous algae blooms that take over swaths of the state's Great Lake each summer.

Trucker and 10 others convicted for cheating BWC

Agency owed more than $500,000 in restitution

Ohio Wildlife Council approves 2018-2019 hunting regulations

The 2018-2019 hunting and trapping seasons were among the regulations approved by the Ohio Wildlife Council at its scheduled meeting on Thursday, May 17, according to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR).

Prevention and self-management can ensure healthy lives with chronic conditions

The Ohio Department of Aging works every day to provide resources for individuals and communities to help our elders live as independently as possible, for as long as possible, in the settings they prefer. As we age, many of us will develop chronic conditions, such as diabetes, heart disease or arthritis, and with the right supports, we can continue to thrive.

Report finds nearly 60,000 ohioans homeless in 2016

The Ohio Human Services Data Warehouse (OHSDW) has released the first in a series of groundbreaking reports exposing the troubling extent of Ohio's homelessness crisis. It finds that 58,484 Ohioans received homeless services in 2016 from seven of Ohio's nine Continuum of Care (CoCs) organizations; that's more than the entire population of Vinton, Monroe, Noble and Morgan counties combined.

Columbus gets contradictory reports on people moving there

Recent studies offer a mix perspective on central Ohio migration.

CAANE Elder Celebration - June 7, 2018

Local seniors are invited to attend a day of workshops and gain information about healthy lifestyles and how to protect themselves against abuse, neglect and exploitation. The CAANE Elder Celebration will be held Thursday, June 7, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the Trotwood YMCA (506 E. Main St., Trotwood OH 45426).

County Commissioners to appoint Michael Colbert as County Administrator

Montgomery County Commissioners Judy Dodge, Dan Foley and Debbie Lieberman have announced the selection of Michael Colbert as the next Montgomery County Administrator. Colbert is currently Assistant County Administrator – Development Services and oversees Workforce and Economic Development. He will replace Joe Tuss who is retiring at the end of August.

Progress report - Justice Committee for the Montgomery County jail

Thirteen months ago, in response to numerous lawsuits brought against Montgomery County for alleged abuses, the Montgomery County Commissioners and the County Sheriff jointly selected citizens to form a non-partisan Justice Committee charged over two years to review and analyze the strengths, weaknesses and challenges of the jail, and to provide the Sheriff and County Commissioners with recommendations for improvements. The committee is acutely aware that the community is waiting impatiently for its report. This process required a great deal of education about the jail for the committee members. The committee is now offering this progress report after its first year of work.

The Cincinnati Zoo Academy

The Cincinnati Zoo Academy has been a part of the public school system in Cincinnati since 1975. In 1995, the program underwent a substantial change from a strictly vocational program with an emphasis on natural resources and wildlife management to a four year college preparatory program where the students earn vocational degrees by working with zoo keepers for two hours a day. During the 2008 – 2009 school year we initiated a transition and became a Tech Prep program with articulation agreements with UC Blue Ash and Cincinnati State. Students spend their ninth and tenth grade years at the Hughes High School. During their eleventh and twelfth grade years they will spend part of each day at the Zoo Academy on zoo grounds.

University of Dayton to host Antioch writers’ summer workshop

Sharpen your writing and leadership skills at the Antioch Writers Summer Workshop and Center for Leadership events.

WSU softball falls in semi-finals

The Wright State softball team fell in the semifinals of the Horizon League Tournament last weekend, losing 2-1 at the hands of Oakland University.

Cleveland man pleads guilty to stealing $77,000 in federal grants designed to help Native Americans

A Cleveland man pleaded guilty to stealing more than $77,000 in federal grants designed to help Native Americans.