Bookmark this page on your mobile

QR Code image

What is this?

Daily Court Reporter - News Supreme Court of Ohio heard three oral arguments on Wednesday, February 14th, including a dispute over whether a shared parking lot can be included in a stores tax valuation


Supreme Court of Ohio heard three oral arguments on Wednesday, February 14th, including a dispute over whether a shared parking lot can be included in a stores tax valuation

Dan Trevas, Supreme Court of Ohio

The Ohio Supreme Court heard three oral arguments on Wednesday, February 14th, including a challenge brought by a grocery store that claims the state tax appeal board inappropriately added the value of a parking lot not owned by the store to its tax valuation.

Summaries Available

Below is a summary of the three arguments heard Wednesday. Along with the descriptions in this article, the Office of Public Information has released in-depth summaries of the cases available online at:

Worthington City Schools Board of Education et. al. v. Franklin County Board of Revision et. al., Case no. 2017-0003

Ohio Board of Tax Appeals


Was the adjustment by a grocery store’s appraiser properly made to adjust for physical differences between the store’s property and properties with comparable sales?

Did the Board of Tax Appeals fail to value the store property’s fee simple interest, as if unencumbered?

Did the Board of Tax Appeals’ decision impermissibly require the store to pay property tax on a parking lot not owned by the store?


The Franklin County auditor valued a Kroger grocery store in Worthington at $3 million for tax year 2014. The retail store sits on 1.699 acres, which doesn’t include a parking lot. To provide parking to customers, the Kroger Company entered an agreement with the owner of the parking lot in front of the store for a voluntary easement that gave Kroger the non-exclusive right to use the shared lot.

Kroger filed a complaint with Franklin County Board of Revision, arguing for a reduction in the auditor’s $3 million valuation. The Worthington City School District Board of Education submitted a counter-complaint asking to retain the auditor’s valuation of the property for tax purposes.

At a hearing before the board of revision, an appraiser for the grocery store placed the property’s taxable value at $2.39 million. The appraiser looked at sales of comparable retail outlets. Noting the Kroger property’s low land-to-building ratio because the parking lot isn’t part of the property, the appraiser calculated an adjustment to the comparable property values to account for that fact. The school board’s appraiser determined, however, that the property’s value was between $4.9 million and $5 million, and rejected the reduction made by the store’s appraiser.

In February 2016, the board of revision accepted the store appraiser’s valuation, reducing the property’s taxable value to $2.39 million.

The school board appealed the decision to the Board of Tax Appeals (BTA). The BTA ruled in December 2016 that the adjustment made by the store’s appraiser was improper and determined the property’s value for taxes was $3.95 million.

Kroger appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court in January 2017. At that time, the law gave parties a right to appeal BTA rulings to the Supreme Court, which was mandated to hear the cases. The Court’s rules provided for oral argument either to a master commissioner or the full court. Kroger requested argument before the full court, which was granted.

State of Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation v. Loretta M. Verlinger, et al., Case no. 2017-0102

Ninth District Court of Appeals (Summit County)


Must an injured worker who was denied workers’ compensation benefits notify the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) of a settlement with the person causing the injury if the worker is appealing the denial of benefits?

Under R.C. RC. 4123.931 does BWC have subrogation rights to recover medical payments made for an injured worker if at the time of the settlement the bureau had not paid any benefits?

For the purposes of R.C. 4123.931, is the bureau of workers compensation notified of a proposed settlement if the injured workers reports to the bureau the names of the parties involved in the accident and their insurance companies?


Loretta Verlinger was employed at her husband’s business Together Leather in Northfield. On Aug. 1, 2011, Verlinger was riding with her husband on a motorcycle when she was struck by a car driven by Suzanne Wolke. The accident occurred around 7 p.m. Verlinger told investigators the store closed at 7 p.m. and she was on her way to a customer’s home to sew couch cushions.

Verlinger suffered severe injuries to her leg. She was life-flighted from the accident scene to hospital, where she spent seven days recovering from surgery. She then spent about three weeks at a nursing home. On August 17, Verlinger filed a claim with BWC seeking coverage for medical payments and lost wages, stating that the accident occurred during the course of employment. A BWC representative contacted her the next day and discussed the accident with Verlinger. BWC also obtained an accident report from the Sagamore Hills Police Department that cited Wolke, and Wolke admitted to causing the accident. The bureau obtained the names of both parties’ insurers, and also the name and address of the customer Verlinger was supposedly on her way to see.

On Sept. 2, BWC denied Verlinger’s claim, stating there was no proof Verlinger had an appointment or was on her way to an appointment with a customer. Verlinger appealed her claim to the Ohio Industrial Commission. Verlinger also filed a lawsuit against Wolke’s insurance company, Metropolitan General Property and Casualty Insurance, and her insurer, Foremost Property and Casualty Insurance. On Dec. 15, while her appeal was still pending, Verlinger settled for $250,000 with the insurance companies, and she did notify the bureau of the settlement. A week after the settlement, the Industrial Commission overturned the BWC denial and found Verlinger was entitled to BWC payments.

In July 2103, BWC sued Verlinger, Metropolitan, and Foremost in Summit County Common Pleas Court. The bureau argued that under Ohio’s “recovery statute” (R.C. 4123.931), the three violated the subrogation provisions of the law by not notifying the bureau of payments. It argued that the law allowed BWC to hold the injured worker and the two insurers jointly and severally liable for the money it paid to Verlinger. BWC claimed it paid about $74,000 in benefits and would pay $46,000 in the future, and that it was entitled to recovery $120,000 of the $250,000.

The trial court ruled that under R.C. 4123.931, the bureau was not entitled to the recovery because it had denied Verlinger benefits at the time of the settlement. The Ninth District Court of Appeals affirmed the decision and BWC appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case.

Judith Pelletier v. City of Campbell et al., Case no. 2017-0088

Seventh District Court of Appeals (Mahoning County)


Did roadside foliage qualify as an “obstruction” for purposes of determining whether a political subdivision was immune from a claim that alleges negligent failure to maintain a public road?

Does the exception to political subdivision immunity when there is failure to keep public roads in repair require that the actual public road be in a deteriorated, damaged, or disassembled state?


Judith Pelletier drove into an intersection in the city of Campbell on the morning of Aug. 22, 2013, and collided with an oncoming vehicle. Pelletier said she couldn’t see the stop sign at the intersection because overgrown shrubs obscured her view of the sign. There was no stop sign for traffic traveling on the cross street.

In March 2014, Pelletier sued the city of Campbell, along with the owner of the property with the shrubs, the mortgage lender, and a property services company the bank hired to take care of the property during a foreclosure process. Pelletier argued that the city had a duty to remove the shrubs and maintain the stop sign to keep it visible to motorists traveling on the street.

The city contended that it had immunity from the lawsuit as a government entity, and asked the trial court for summary judgment. The court denied the city’s motion in November 2015.

On appeal, the Seventh District Court of Appeals also concluded the city wasn’t entitled to summary judgment because the determination whether exceptions to government immunity applied in this case required a jury to consider the facts.

The city appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court, which agreed to review the issues.

Date Published: February 28, 2018


Supreme Court of Ohio


Three people charged for their roles in conspiracy to recruit poor and homeless people and file fraudulent tax returns on their behalf

Three people were charged in federal court for their roles in a conspiracy to recruit poor and homeless people to allow them to file fraudulent tax returns on their behalf, said U.S. Attorney Justin E. Herdman and IRS Special Agent in Charge Ryan L. Korner.

$8 Million available through Ohio’s Community Connectors Program

For the fourth year, community organizations, faith- or values-based groups and businesses are being asked to partner to encourage one-on-one mentorship in Ohio’s schools and help give more students access to role models who can motivate and inspire them.

U.S. Attorneys announce initiative to combat violent crime and drug trafficking

Recently, the three United States Attorneys for the Southern Tristate area: Robert M. Duncan, Jr., of the Eastern District of Kentucky; Michael B. Stuart, of the Southern District of West Virginia; and Benjamin C. Glassman, of the Southern District of Ohio, along with representatives from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), state and local law enforcement and prosecutors, and other law enforcement partners announced the formation of a law enforcement working group, to enhance joint efforts to combat violent crime and drug trafficking in the Kentucky, West Virginia, and Ohio Tri-State area.

Ginseng hunters reminded about upcoming March deadline

American ginseng hunters are being reminded that uncertified root may not be possessed after March 31 without a weight receipt, according to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR). Anyone planning to keep uncertified ginseng beyond the deadline must schedule an appointment to get it weighed and documented.

Local government payrolls remain lean since recession

Employment in Ohio's public sector has not returned to pre-recession levels for the final month of each year.

New indictment charges Columbus MS-13 gang members with conspiracy to commit racketeering, including five Ohio murders

Total of 29 defendants charged by indictment or criminal complaint in Columbus

Accountants adjust to changes in tax law as filing season arrives

In the wake of the largest tax overhaul in 30 years that was signed into law last year, some Ohio tax professionals are helping their clients understand the impact on their upcoming tax returns.

Latest amendment to self-defense proposal draws constitutional criticism

Ohio prosecutors and public defenders took aim earlier recently at an amendment to a House bill that would puts the onus on the state to refute self-defense claims in shootings.

Three from the Akron area indicted for their roles in a conspiracy in which they forged the signatures of medical professionals to obtain thousands of Oxycodone pills and other drugs

Three people from the Akron area were indicted in federal court for their roles in a conspiracy in which they forged the signatures of medical professionals to illegally obtain thousands of Oxycodone pills and other drugs, law enforcement officials said.

Theory that brake dust led to asbestos-related death does not meet Ohio law

A theory which posits that every nonminimal exposure to asbestos can be a substantial factor in causing asbestos-related disease is inconsistent with Ohio’s test for causation, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled.

Ohio’s 529 plan celebrates new milestone

Effective Jan. 1, 2018, the state income tax deduction for contributions made to Ohio’s 529 increased to $4,000 for Ohioans. Passed by the Ohio General Assembly, this expanded tax benefit further encourages current and future CollegeAdvantage 529 Plan account owners to save for their children’s future college costs. Other tax advantages for saving for college in Ohio’s 529 Plan include tax-free earnings, so every dollar is yours to use, and tax-free withdrawals when used for qualified higher education.

IBAHRI open letter calls on President Xi Jinping to end persecution of legal professionals in China

In an open letter to His Excellency Mr Xi Jinping, President of the People's Republic of China, the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI) has called for the cessation of the persecution of human rights lawyers in China and for adherence to the international legal instruments that safeguard the independence of legal professionals.

Herd of proponents offer testimony in support of legalizing residential livestock

Fans of urban farming and some of the latter-day homesteaders themselves turned up for the most recent hearing of a bill that would legalize some residential livestock throughout the Buckeye State.

Supreme Court of Ohio upholds death sentences of man who Used Craigslist to lure victims

The Ohio Supreme Court has affirmed the convictions and death sentences of an Akron man who used employment ads on Craigslist to lure men who he robbed and murdered.

New Bridges Program to help former foster youth achieve independence

A new program launching this week will help former foster youth more successfully transition to independence, the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and the Child and Family Health Collaborative of Ohio announced. The voluntary program, called Bridges, extends housing and other supportive services to eligible young adults who leave foster care on or after their 18th birthday but are not yet 21.

Bill aims to remedy third-party practice of rejecting lawful powers of attorney

Lawyer and small businessman-cum-legislator Democrat Rep. John Rogers of Mentor-on-the-Lake has championed a bill that addresses a growing problem of third-party institutions rejecting lawful Ohio powers of attorney.

Bill designed to increase student safety with stricter system of alerting parents

The Cleveland senator sponsoring a bill that would require all Ohio schools to adhere to a strict absence-phone-call policy expects to get a vote before the Ohio Senate in coming days.

Rockets Notch 11th Win in Last 12 Games with 82-74 Victory over Ohio

Toledo raced out to a 15-0 lead in the game's first five minutes en route to a wire-to-wire 82-74 victory over Mid-American Conference East Division foe Ohio. The victory was the Rockets' fourth in a row and 11th in last 12 outings and kept UT (19-7, 11-2 MAC) in a tie with Buffalo (19-7, 11-2 MAC) for the conference's best record.

Supreme Court of Ohio heard three oral arguments on Wednesday, February 14th, including a dispute over whether a shared parking lot can be included in a stores tax valuation

The Ohio Supreme Court heard three oral arguments on Wednesday, February 14th, including a challenge brought by a grocery store that claims the state tax appeal board inappropriately added the value of a parking lot not owned by the store to its tax valuation.

Attorney General DeWine files lawsuit against DuPont for releasing toxic chemical into Ohio for decades

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine recently filed a lawsuit against the chemical company DuPont, alleging that for decades, DuPont released a toxic chemical from its plant on the Ohio River, despite knowing the risks it posed to Ohio’s citizens and natural resources.