Bookmark this page on your mobile

QR Code image

What is this?

Daily Court Reporter - News Strip club not liable for auto accident injuries caused by intoxicated dancer


Strip club not liable for auto accident injuries caused by intoxicated dancer

Dan Trevas, Supreme Court of Ohio

Ohio’s “Dram Shop Act” limits the legal responsibility of liquor permit holders not only for acts of an intoxicated customer who causes an accident after leaving the establishment where drinks are sold, but also for acts of any intoxicated worker or person after they leave, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled recently.

The Supreme Court’s 6-1 decision found the Dram Shop Act applied in a case where Mary Montgomery, a dancer at a Dayton strip club, was provided drinks by patrons and on her drive home hit a vehicle in which Nichole Johnson was a passenger. Johnson suffered multiple injuries and incurred more than $1 million in medical expenses.

The Court affirmed a Second District Court of Appeals decision that found Johnson could only pursue a claim against the club and its owner under the Dram Shop Act, which is R.C. 4399.18. Writing for the Court majority, Justice R. Patrick DeWine concluded that law holds the club responsible in limited circumstances including if the owner or an employee knowingly sold drinks to a “noticeably intoxicated person.” He wrote the trial court concluded that Montgomery was not noticeably intoxicated when she left and found the club was not liable for the damage.

The Court also ruled the only way to legally pursue a claim for injuries caused off premises against a liquor permit holder is by using the Dram Shop Act. The trial court had allowed Johnson to pursue a separate common law negligence claim against Michael C. Ferraro and his business, Thirty-Eight Thirty, Inc., which operated The Living Room strip club in Dayton.

A jury awarded Johnson $2.85 million from Thirty-Eight Thirty, but the Second District Court of Appeals reversed the decision, finding that Johnson could only sue using the Dram Shop Act. The trial court did not allow the jury to consider her Dram Shop Act claim.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice William M. O’Neill wrote he finds it hard to believe the Court would allow the outcome to stand, taking away the verdict to Johnson and not sending the case back where the jury, not the magistrate, could consider whether under the Dram Shop Act, the club was responsible for her injuries.

Club Encouraged Patron to Buy Dancers Drinks

Montgomery and The Living Room dancers were independent contractors. She paid the club $30 a night to lease space to dance, and in return she kept all the tips from customers. The club paid no wages or compensation. Although not required to drink, dancers did consume alcohol and the practice was encouraged by the club’s waitresses, who urged customers to buy drinks for the dancers. The club owner benefited because the club charged higher prices for drinks purchased for the dancers than for drinks the customers bought for themselves.

Ferraro testified that 95 percent of the club’s profit came from alcohol sales and 30 to 40 percent of the alcohol purchased was by customers for dancers. There was no limit on how many drinks could be purchased for dancers, and Ferraro allowed other employees including bartenders and bouncers to drink while working too.

In July 2010, Montgomery ingested cocaine on a day she went to dance at The Living Room. While working she consumed “a few” beers purchased for her by customers. Late that evening she drove home on Interstate 70 and struck a car in which Johnson was the passenger. Johnson was severely injured.

Injured Woman Sues Stripper and Club

Johnson filed a lawsuit against Montgomery, Ferraro, and Thirty-Eight Thirty, making two claims. She claimed the club and owner violated the Dram Shop Act, and she claimed that the dancer, club, and owner were negligent.

A Montgomery County Common Pleas Court magistrate presided over a jury trial in the case against Ferraro and the club. After the parties presented their cases to the jury, the magistrate issued a directed verdict in favor of Ferraro and the club. The magistrate allowed the jury to consider just the negligence claim, and the jury ruled the club owed Johnson $2.85 million. The trial court judge adopted the magistrate’s decision and the jury verdict.

Johnson appealed the trial court’s decision to the Second District, claiming Ferraro was also personally responsible and she should be awarded damages from him. He and the club cross appealed, arguing that claims against liquor permit holders for accidents involving intoxicated persons can only be made using the Dram Shop Act, and that the trial court should have never allowed the jury to consider the common law negligence claim. The Second District agreed, and reversed the judgment against the club.

Johnson appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case, and conducted oral arguments at an off-site court session in Morgan County in April.

Act Applies to Workers, Not Just Customers

Justice DeWine explained that Johnson did not appeal the directed verdict against her and the issue of whether the jury should have heard claim by evaluating the Dram Shop Act is not an issue Johnson asked the Court to consider. Instead, Johnson argued the Dram Shop Act only applies to liquor permit holders and their patrons, not to workers or independent contractors like Montgomery. Because of the act’s limits, Johnson argued she is allowed to pursue the negligence claim, and maintained the jury verdict should stand.

The opinion noted the act’s language that a permit holder is liable only if the establishment knowingly sold drinks to “a noticeably intoxicated person,” and that person’s intoxication resulted in injury, death, or property damage.

The definition of “sale” is defined broadly and includes “exchange, barter, gift, offer for sale, sale, distribution and delivery of any kind, and the transfer of title or possession of beer and intoxicating liquor either by constructive or actual delivery by any means or devices whatever,” the Court noted. The Court concluded that the act applies whether the drinks were purchased directly by the intoxicated person or by someone else who gives it to the intoxicated person. Montgomery testified she consumed drinks given to her by customers.

Johnson claimed the law actually means drinks sold to an “intoxicated patron,” and pointed to other cases before the Supreme Court involving Dram Shop Act claims.

“But the decisions cited by Johnson do not squarely address the issue whether ‘intoxicated person’ should be interpreted to include only intoxicated patrons. The word ‘patron’ was used in those cases because the allegedly intoxicated person was in fact a patron; the word was not intended as a limitation on the class of persons covered by the statute,” the opinion stated.

The Court explained that the law’s plain, everyday meaning of the word “person” is not limited to patrons.

“A patron or a customer is a person, as is a dancer or a worker or an independent contractor. The statute does not limit the definition of ‘person’ based on the individual’s relationship to the permit holder. We conclude ‘intoxicated person’ includes an ‘intoxicated worker,’” the Court stated.

The Court noted it was “not indifferent to the steep toll exacted by drunken driving,” but arguments for narrowing the statute to apply only to patrons are “more properly addressed” by the state legislature.

Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor and Justices Sharon L. Kennedy and Patrick F. Fischer joined Justice DeWine’s opinion. Justices Terrence O’Donnell and Judith L. French concurred in judgment only.

Magistrate Ignored Evidence, Dissent Asserted

In his dissent, Justice O’Neill wrote the magistrate’s finding was directly contrary to the evidence, including Montgomery’s testimony that she was drunk the night of the accident and became drunk while dancing. Justice O’Neill also found it hard to ignore why Montgomery was driving drunk that night, and how it was possible that the club owners and employees could not be held responsible.

“It is beyond comprehension that the majority does not address the fact that this entire sordid fact pattern was predictable, planned, intentionally created, and designed into a business plan. Tragically that business plan is now ratified by the Supreme Court of Ohio,” he wrote.

He noted that no arrangements were made to ensure dancers did not drive drunk after drinking on the job at the encouragement of the owner, and he said the strip club operated on a “business model that is as unbelievable as it is unconscionable.”

He also wrote that while Johnson’s appeal might not have addressed the directed verdict, the Court has its own authority to address an issue in a case if it might have an effect on the “character of, and the public confidence in, judicial proceedings.”

“This court should not take away a negligence verdict and look the other way regarding a Dram Shop Act claim that we can see was wrongfully taken away early in the lawsuit. To do so is to absolve the club entirely of responsibility,” he wrote.

He added that if only the Dram Shop Act applies, the jury should consider Johnson’s claim that the club violated that law.

2016-0790. Johnson v. Montgomery, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-7445.

A pdf of the opinion can be found online at:

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion, but only for noteworthy cases. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of court opinions. The full text of this and other court opinions are available online.

Date Published: September 26, 2017


Supreme Court of Ohio


Man sentenced to nearly three years in prison for illegal demolition of former factory

A Cleveland man was sentenced to nearly three years in prison for violating the Clean Air Act by failing to remove asbestos prior to demolishing a former factory in Cleveland, law enforcement officials said.

Seven indicted following drug trafficking investigation

(McConnelsville, OH) Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine, Morgan County Prosecutor Mark Howdyshell, Washington County Sheriff Larry Mincks, and members of the Washington Morgan Noble Major Crimes Task Force announced recently the indictments of seven individuals suspected of operating and/or participating in a large-scale drug trafficking organization with ties to Morgan, Washington, Muskingum, and Franklin counties.

State must prove charter school building operators intended to profit from lease deals

The Ohio Supreme Court recently overturned denials of property tax exemptions sought by the building manager of two Horizon Science Academy charter schools in Columbus. The Court found that state taxing authorities used the wrong standard to conclude the corporation attempted to profit from leasing educational space.

Battelle reveals new anti-drone device

Battelle introduced a new version of the DroneDefender device at the Air Force Association's Air, Space & Cyber Conference's Technology Symposium on recently.

Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral arguments last month, including an appeal of a death penalty sentence for a murderer who found victims through Craigslist

The Ohio Supreme Court heard three oral arguments Tuesday, September 26th, including an appeal from Richard Beasley, an Ohio death-row prisoner who placed ads on Craigslist to lure potential murder victims. He claims that the media coverage surrounding his actions ensured that he did not receive a fair and impartial trial.

Ohio companies tackle health insurers' PA requests

(Columbus) Local companies are seeking to disrupt a practice by health insurers that has been criticized for delaying doctor-prescribed medications for patients.

Defendants charged with intent to distribute 720 kilos of cocaine in first of its kind case in southern Ohio

(Columbus) Four defendants are being transported to Columbus, Ohio today for federal prosecution in the Southern District of Ohio after being charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute approximately 720 kilograms of cocaine. The more than 1,584 pounds of cocaine has an approximate street value of $25 million in total.

AEP honored for economic development efforts

American Electric Power has been recognized by Site Selection Magazine as one of the country's top 10 utilities for economic development.

Attorney General DeWine offers updated information regarding the Equifax breach

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine recently offered updated information for consumers following the recent announcement by Equifax of a major data breach affecting over 5 million Ohioans. Equifax, one of the nation’s three major credit reporting bureaus, has stated that their system was compromised between May and July of this year and includes names, Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses and driver’s license numbers.

Public records reboot

Last September, legislation took effect that launched a new way for people who think they’ve been wrongfully denied a public record to challenge their lack of access. The law aims to offer “an expeditious and economical procedure that attempts to resolve disputes” about public records. The appeals are heard in the Ohio Court of Claims, which handles most civil lawsuits against the state, including public agencies and state universities.

PUCO issues Winter Reconnect Order for 2017–2018

The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) recently approved the Winter Reconnect Order to help Ohioans reconnect or maintain electric and natural gas service during the winter heating season between Oct. 16, 2017 and April 13, 2018. Any customer of a PUCO-regulated electric or natural gas utility may take advantage of the order. Last winter heating season, more than 228,000 Ohio utility customers utilized the PUCO’s Winter Reconnect Order.

3 reasons to go cashless

(BPT) The dollar, the euro, the pound, the yen... the currency people use around the world has many different names, but it all shares something in common. Paper forms of currency are out and digital payments are in. The security and convenience of card based electronic payments and digital payments are driving a global shift away from cash. As consumers and merchants around the world become more and more digitally connected this shift will continue to accelerate.

Court had authority to return Akron police officer to prison for wife’s murder

The Summit County Prosecuting Attorney had the right to appeal a judgment declaring a former Akron police captain innocent of murdering his wife, and a common pleas court judge had the right to send him back to prison, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled recently.

Bill gives PUCO submetering oversight

A Republican lawmaker from Worthington believes high-rise residents and those in other residential settings throughout the state are getting a bad deal when it comes to having a say in their utilities.

Bill focuses on vision care practices

Members of the House Insurance Committee are mulling a bill that would eliminate the seemingly arbitrary limitations health insurers impose on vision care services for Ohio consumers.

Trucking industry braces as e-log mandate approaches

Luke Roy said he expects to seem some "headbutting" when most trucking companies must use electronic logging devices by the December deadline.

West Nile Virus confirmed in Ohio horses

The Ohio Department of Agriculture recently confirmed the first positive cases of West Nile Virus (WNV) in Ohio horses for 2017. Multiple cases in different parts of the state have been reported. The horses confirmed to have contracted WNV had not been vaccinated. The spread of WNV in horses is preventable with proper vaccination and horse owners are urged to ensure their animal’s vaccine and boosters are up to date.

Treasurer Josh Mandel announces launch of the Ohio University Checkbook on

Ohio University posts largest amount of checkbook level spending online of any public university in state

Pro teams back fantasy sports bill

Ohio appears to be well on its way to joining 16 other states that have eased gambling laws to permit fantasy sports contests.

Survey: Social Security causing concerns for future retirees

In a new survey, retirees are voicing their concerns over quality of life in retirement.